Translational Research Graphic Organizer Template Examples
Use the “Translational Research Graphic Organizer Template” to compare three types of translational research with traditional (qualitative or quantitative) research. Make sure to include methodology, goals, and data collection in your organizer.
You are required to cite three to five sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.
ORDER A CUSTOM-WRITTEN, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE
While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. Translational Research Graphic Organizer Template Examples.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.
TranslationalResearchGraphicOrganizerTemplate
Translational Research Graphic Organizer Template
| <Type Translational Research Type Here> | <Type Traditional (Qualitative or Quantitative) Research Type Here> | Observations (Similarities/Differences) | |
| Methodology |
|
||
| Goals |
|
Translational Research Graphic Organizer Template Examples | |
| Data Collection |
|
Translational Research Graphic Organizer
NUR-550 Translational Research and Population Health Management
| Mapping the emergence and development of translational cancer research | Why the distinction between basic (theoretical) and applied (practical) research is important in the politics of science | Observations (Similarities/Differences) | |
| Methodology | Translation research requires the researcher to be directly involved with the variables to ensure the intended outcome is reached (Cambrosio, Keating, & Mercier, 2015). The researcher controls dependent variable during the research process.
|
Methodologies used in traditional research for data collection included face-to-face focus groups, interviews, surveys (Roll-Hansen, 2013). | Both are complex and hypothesis-oriented researches
In both research, the researcher designs and actively participate in the research process. Also, in both, the end objective of the research is not directly specified in the beginning and the process results in solving the intended research problem. |
| Goals | Translation research is a highly interdisciplinary field and the goal is primarily to combine the assets of these various disciplines, resources, and expertise into one group to improve the global healthcare system significantly (Cambrosio, Keating, & Mercier, 2015). The results are to promote enhancements in prevention, diagnosis, and therapies in health care. | Traditional research is a systematic process that requires a standard scientific method (Al-Hadithy, 2015). The research is used to improve knowledge by the researchers (Roll-Hansen, 2013). | The difference between translational and traditional research is that fundamentally translational research focuses on improve practice rather than producing knowledge as with traditional research (Al-Hadithy, 2015).
Translational research is also requires high demand for personal commitment and involvement unlike in comparison to traditional research. |
| Data Collection | Translation research utilizes standardized questionnaires or interviews are utilized when preforming data collection (Cambrosio, Keating, & Mercier, 2015).
|
Traditional reserch can use phone interviews, online surveys, and structured questionnaires (Roll-Hansen, 2013). The reserch can have a large sample size and hence demands more time to ensure high quality data is collected. Data management programs are also utilized as randomizing, trending, and predicting instrument, which help the researchers processes and analyze data. | In both methods, the researchers utilized questionnaires and interviews when collecting their data.
In translational research, the researchers had freedom of controlling the dependent variables to ensure the desired outcomes were achieved, while in traditional research, the researcher answers the questions that the research aimed to answer. |
References
Roll-Hansen, N. (2013). “Why the distinction between basic (theoretical) and applied (practical) research is important in the politics of science” (PDF) (Report). The London School of Economics and Political Science.
Cambrosio, A., Keating, P., Mercier, S. (2015). “Mapping the emergence and development of translational cancer research”, European Journal of Cancer, Elsevier Ltd, 42 (28): 3140–3148, doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2006.07.020.
Al-Hadithy, T. (2015). The Traditional Vs. The Modern Translation Classroom: A Need for New Directions in the UAE Undergraduate Translation Programs. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences,192, 180-187. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.026 Translational Research Graphic Organizer Template Examples
Translational Research Graphic Organizer Template Examples rubric
| Course Code | Class Code | |||||
| NUR-550 | NUR-550-O101 | Translational Research Graphic Organizer | 100.0 | |||
| Criteria | Percentage | Unsatisfactory (0.00%) | Less than Satisfactory (80.00%) | Satisfactory (88.00%) | Good (92.00%) | Excellent (100.00%) |
| Translational Research Graphic Organizer | 100.0% | Translational Research Graphic Organizer Template Examples | ||||
| Comparison of Research in Relation to Methodology | 25.0% | A comparison of research in relation to methodology is not included. | A comparison of research in relation to methodology is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. | A comparison of research in relation to methodology is present. | A comparison of research in relation to methodology is clearly provided and well developed. | A comprehensive comparison of research in relation to methodology is thoroughly developed with supporting details. |
| Comparison of Research in Relation to Goals | 25.0% | A comparison of research in relation to goals is not included. | A comparison of research in relation to goals is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. | A comparison of research in relation to goals is present. | A comparison of research in relation to goals is clearly provided and well developed. | A comprehensive comparison of research in relation to goals is thoroughly developed with supporting details. |
| Comparison of Research in Relation to Data Collection | 25.0% | A comparison of research in relation to data collection is not included. | A comparison of research in relation to data collection is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. | A comparison of research in relation to data collection is present. | A comparison of research in relation to data collection is clearly provided and well developed. | A comprehensive comparison research in relation to data collection is thoroughly developed with supporting details. |
| Required Sources | 5.0% | Sources are not included. | Number of required sources is only partially met. | Number of required sources is met, but sources are outdated or inappropriate. | Number of required sources is met. Sources are current, but not all sources are appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content. | Number of required resources is met. Sources are current, and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content. |
| Presentation | 10.0% | The piece is not neat or organized, and it does not include all required elements. | The work is not neat and includes minor flaws or omissions of required elements. | The overall appearance is general, and major elements are missing. | The overall appearance is generally neat, with a few minor flaws or missing elements. | The work is well presented and includes all required elements. The overall appearance is neat and professional. |
| Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use) | 5.0% | Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is employed. | Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. | Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. | Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. | The writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. |
| Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) | 5.0% | Sources are not documented. | Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. | Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. |
| Total Weightage | 100% | Translational Research Graphic Organizer Template Examples |