PSYC 6717 week 2 Assignment: Parsimony Essay
BCBA’s use techniques precluding essential consistent clarifications, either experimentally, prior to inspecting more intricate or dynamic data. The thought prompts the idea of making the least presumptions essential while clarifying a circumstance or thing. Parsimony incorporates the most fundamental straightforward clarifications that attention exclusively on the most pertinent realities and information accessible while ignoring any remaining elements.
Parsimony takes a stab at lucidity through straightforwardness while talking about a forthcoming intercession with a parent or educator. Parsimony is proper in the accompanying manners:
Parsimony is a more productive strategy for deciding the most straightforward, least convoluted response for a situation or perception.
Parsimony is useful in both learning and educating.
ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE
Parsimony s assesses direct effects, is tendency movements to moderation as a method for accomplishing lucidity utilizing the least stages, with the least assets, to show up at the best outcome. Thus, it suggests seeking after the most productive and approach plausible by the parent or an educator. Parsimony tracks down the most essential and right clarification for cerebrum cycles and human activities. PSYC 6717 week 2 Assignment: Parsimony Essay
Actual points, exercises, looks, test results, and different subtleties are inadequate in depictions or clarifications. An instructor might have to realize this to convey viably to understudies.
PSYC 6717 week 2 Assignment: Parsimony Essay
Parsimony additionally makes correspondence simpler and improves the probability that the data is perceived. In showing new ideas, language and suitable models ease understanding. Better arrangement will furnish educators and guardians with a simple method to show understudies and young people separately. Parsimony in brain science is direct, reasonable, and significant. It’s likewise important that the clarifications are right and dependable. Parsimony in brain research is significant to conduct experts when managing emotional well-being hardships.
References
Cooper, J. O., Heron, T. E., & Heward, W. L. (2020). Applied behavior analysis (3rd ed.). Pearson.
Epstein, R. (1984). The principle of parsimony and some applications in psychology. The Journal of Mind and Behavior, 119-130
PSYC 6717 week 2 Assignment: Parsimony Essay
Photo Credit: iushakovsky – stock.adobe.com
For this week’s Discussion, you examined a common set of assumptions characterizing the behavior of behavior analysts. One of those assumptions is the Law of Parsimony. The history and etymology of the word parsimony is from the Latin pars-, meaning “to act sparingly, be thrifty (with), refrain from” (Merriam-Webster, n.d.). By extension, the Law of Parsimony posits that given two explanations for a given phenomenon, you should choose the simplest scientific explanation that fits the evidence parsimony essay.
Ultimately, an important purpose for using parsimonious interpretations is to enable a principle of economy when determining where new findings might incorporate into the existing knowledge base of a given field. By way of illustration, consider the following review regarding negative symptoms in schizophrenia. In the review, the authors identify a lengthy list of nearly 20 negative schizophrenia symptoms ranging from different forms of affect issues to poor grooming to asociality. Applying the law of parsimony (referred to as Occam’s Razor in the review) the authors simplified their evidence by stating, “…we propose that while negative symptoms are varied and broad in both their clinical presentation and longitudinal course, they can all be subsumed under the concept of avolition. As the primary construct, avolition translates to decreased functional performance, a hallmark of schizophrenia’s longer-term outcome but identifiable in its earliest stages” (Foussias, & Remington, 2010).
For this Assignment, you will consider why parsimony is an important construct a behavior analyst might use when communicating interventions to a parent or teacher.
References:
Foussias, G., & Remington, G. (2010). Negative symptoms in schizophrenia: Avolition and Occam’s razor. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 36(2), 359–369. https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbn094
Merriam-Webster. (n.d.). Parsimony. Retrieved February 6, 2021, from https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/parsimony parsimony essay
To Prepare:
- Review this week’s Learning Resources about parsimony.
- Consider practical ways parsimony might be used by a behavior analyst.
Assignment (1 page)
- Write an explanation addressing why parsimony is important for a behavior analyst when communicating a prospective intervention to a parent or teacher. Be parsimonious in your response.
Be sure to support your Assignment with specific references to behavior-analytic theory and research. In addition to the Learning Resources, search the Walden Library and/or the internet for peer-reviewed articles to support your Assignment. Use proper APA format and citations, including those in the Learning Resources.
ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER NOW
By Day 7 of Week 2
Submit your Assignment.
Submission and Grading Information
To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:
- Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK2Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.
- Click on the Week 2 Assignment Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.
- Click on the Week 2 Assignment link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area.
- Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as “WK2Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click on Open.
- If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.
- Click on the Submit button to complete your submission parsimony essay.
| Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Content |
10.5 (70%) – 12 (80%)
Assignment demonstrates an excellent understanding of all of the concepts and key points presented in the text/s and Learning Resources. Assignment provides significant detail including multiple relevant examples, discerning ideas, and evidence from scholarly sources (i.e., Learning Resources, Walden Library, and/or internet).
|
8.5 (56.67%) – 10.25 (68.33%)
Assignment demonstrates a good understanding of most of the concepts and key points presented in the text/s and Learning Resources. Assignment includes moderate detail, discerning ideas, and sufficient evidence from scholarly sources (i.e., Learning Resources, Walden Library, and/or internet).
|
5 (33.33%) – 8.25 (55%)
Assignment demonstrates a fair understanding of the concepts and key points as presented in the text/s and Learning Resources. Assignment may be lacking in detail and specificity and/or may not include sufficient pertinent examples, discerning ideas, evidence from scholarly sources (i.e., Learning Resources, Walden Library, and/or internet).
|
0 (0%) – 4.5 (30%)
Assignment demonstrates poor understanding of the concepts and key points of the text/s and Learning Resources. Assignment is missing detail and specificity and/or does not include any pertinent examples discerning ideas, or sufficient evidence from scholarly sources (i.e., Learning Resources, Walden Library, and/or internet). PSYC 6717 week 2 Assignment: Parsimony Essay |
| Writing |
3 (20%) – 3 (20%)
Assignment is well organized, uses scholarly tone, follows APA style, uses original writing and proper paraphrasing, contains very few or no writing and/or spelling errors, and is fully consistent with graduate-level writing style. Assignment contains multiple, appropriate and exemplary sources expected/required for the assignment (i.e., Learning Resources, Walden Library, and/or internet).
|
2 (13.33%) – 2 (13.33%)
Assignment is mostly consistent with graduate-level writing style. Assignment may have some small or infrequent organization, scholarly tone, or APA style issues, and/or may contain a few writing and spelling errors, and/or somewhat less than the expected number of or type of sources (i.e., scholarly sources from the Learning Resources, Walden Library, and/or internet).
|
1 (6.67%) – 1 (6.67%)
Assignment is somewhat below graduate-level writing style, with multiple smaller or a few major problems. Assignment may be lacking in organization, scholarly tone, APA style, and/or contain many writing and/or spelling errors, or shows moderate reliance on quoting versus original writing and paraphrasing. Assignment may contain inferior sources (number or quality of scholarly sources from the Learning Resources, Walden Library, and/or internet).
|
0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Assignment is well below graduate-level writing style expectations for organization, scholarly tone, APA style, and writing, or relies excessively on quoting. Assignment may contain few or no quality sources (i.e., scholarly sources from the Learning Resources, Walden Library, and/or internet).
|
| Total Points: 15 |
|---|