Off-label prescribing FOR CHILDREN AND ADOLESCENTS : NRNP-6665 WEEK 3 Assignment

Rubric

NRNP_6665_Week3_Assignment1_Rubric
NRNP_6665_Week3_Assignment1_Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
In 1–2 pages, address the following: • Recommend one FDA-approved drug, one off-label drug, and one nonpharmacological intervention for treating your assigned disorder in children and adolescents.

25 to >22.0 pts

Excellent
The response accurately and concisely explains one FDA-approved drug, one off-label drug, and one nonpharmacological intervention that would be appropriate for treating the assigned disorder in children and adolescents.

22 to >19.0 pts

Good
The response accurately explains one FDA-approved drug, one off-label drug, and one nonpharmacological intervention that would be appropriate for treating the assigned disorder in children and adolescents.

19 to >17.0 pts

Fair
The response somewhat vaguely or inaccurately explains one FDA-approved drug, one off-label drug, and one nonpharmacological intervention that would be appropriate for treating the assigned disorder in children and adolescents.

17 to >0 pts

Poor
The response vaguely or inaccurately explains interventions that would be appropriate for treating the assigned disorder in children and adolescents. Interventions may not represent the three types of interventions required, or response may be missing.
25 pts
• Explain the risk assessment you would use to inform your treatment decision making. What are the risks and benefits of the FDA-approved medicine? What are the risks and benefits of the off-label drug?

25 to >22.0 pts

Excellent
The response accurately and concisely explains the risk assessment you would use to inform your treatment decision making. A concise and accurate explanation of the risks and benefits of each pharmacological intervention is provided.

22 to >19.0 pts

Good
The response accurately explains the risk assessment you would use to inform your treatment decision making. An adequate explanation of the risks and benefits of each pharmacological intervention is provided.

19 to >17.0 pts

Fair
The response somewhat vaguely or inaccurately explains the risk assessment you would use to inform your treatment decision making. The explanation of the risks and benefits of each pharmacological intervention is somewhat vague or inaccurate.

17 to >0 pts

Poor
The response vaguely or inaccurately explains the risk assessment you would use to inform your treatment decision making. The risks and benefits of each pharmacological intervention is vague or inaccurate. Or, the response is missing.
25 pts
• Explain whether clinical practice guidelines exist for this disorder and, if so, use them to justify your recommendations. If not, explain what information you would need to take into consideration.

25 to >22.0 pts

Excellent
The response accurately and concisely uses either clinical guidelines (if available) or other information from the literature to justify intervention recommendations.

22 to >19.0 pts

Good
The response accurately uses either clinical guidelines (if available) or other information from the literature to justify intervention recommendations.

19 to >17.0 pts

Fair
The response somewhat vaguely or inaccurately uses either clinical guidelines (if available) or other information from the literature to justify intervention recommendations.

17 to >0 pts

Poor
The response vaguely or inaccurately uses either clinical guidelines (if available) or other information from the literature to justify intervention recommendations. Or, the response is missing.
25 pts
• Support your reasoning with at least three scholarly resources, one each on the FDA-approved drug, the off-label, and a non-medication intervention for the disorder. Be sure they are current (no more than 5 years old). Attach the PDFs of your sources.

10 to >8.0 pts

Excellent
The response provides at least three current, evidence-based resources from the literature to support the intervention recommendations. The resources reflect the latest clinical guidelines and provide strong justification for decision making.

8 to >7.0 pts

Good
The response provides at least three current, evidence-based resources from the literature to support the intervention recommendations Off-label prescribing FOR CHILDREN AND ADOLESCENTS : NRNP-6665 WEEK 3 Assignment .

7 to >6.0 pts

Fair
Three evidence-based resources are provided to support the intervention recommendations, but they may only provide vague or weak justification.

6 to >0 pts

Poor
Two or fewer resources are provided to support the intervention recommendations. The resources may not be current or evidence based.
10 pts
Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction are provided that delineate all required criteria.

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided that delineate all required criteria.

4 to >3.5 pts

Good
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated, yet are brief and not descriptive.

3.5 to >3.0 pts

Fair
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are vague or off topic.

3 to >0 pts

Poor
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity <60% of the time. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion were provided.
5 pts
Written Expression and Formatting – English Writing Standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent
Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors

4 to >3.5 pts

Good
Contains one or two grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors

3.5 to >3.0 pts

Fair
Contains several (three or four) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors

3 to >0 pts

Poor
Contains many (five or more) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding
5 pts
Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/narrative in-text citations, and reference list.

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent
Uses correct APA format with no errors

4 to >3.5 pts

Good
Contains one or two APA format errors

3.5 to >3.0 pts

Fair
Contains several (three or four) APA format errors

3 to >0 pts

Poor
Contains many (five or more) APA format errors
5 pts
Total Points: 100 Off-label prescribing FOR CHILDREN AND ADOLESCENTS : NRNP-6665 WEEK 3 Assignment 
Open chat
WhatsApp chat +1 908-954-5454
We are online
Our papers are plagiarism-free, and our service is private and confidential. Do you need any writing help?