NURS 8210 – Health Information Technology Systems Essay Discussion and Assignment – HIT Usability and Design Challenges Sample Paper
NURS 8210 Week 6: Health Information Technology Systems
NURS 8210 Week 6 Discussion: HIT Usability and Design ChallengesSAMPLE
Usability and design challenges
Staggers (2010) states that usability has a strong, often direct relationship with clinical productivity, error rate, user fatigue, and user satisfaction which make for difficult adaptation. HIT usability is the thread that binds a product to specific users in a specific context in ore to achieve set goals with ‘effectiveness, efficiency and satisfaction’ (ANA, 2015). Nurses or end users are the ones that need to buy into the usability and clinical application design of new technology presented to them (Ball, Douglas, & Walker, 2011). The Technology Informing Education Reform (TIGER) summit highlighted the significance of both through identification, definition, and presentation of two pillars, informatics design, and technology, from and in which to develop their knowledge and beliefs. For usability to be effective, the goals must be met. Being able to affect and transform workflow positively, work with system developers to maximize clinical system development effectiveness with known processes and principles are the goals of which Ball et al. (2011) spoke. Clinical application designs must support evidence-based practice (EBP), be collaborative, provide support for growth and further development of new knowledge and the inception of research into practice (Staggers & Troseth, 2011) NURS 8210 – Health Information Technology Systems Essay Discussion and Assignment – HIT Usability and Design Challenges Sample Paper.
Implementing the case study’s new health information technology system
To implement an almost seamless transition from paper to the new HIT system, I would conduct a needs assessment, survey the facility to locate positions of possible placement of system, check workstation needs, the staff’s ability to learn and their receptiveness to change. Have systems in place in the facility prior to having experienced educators who are familiar with the system, present the HIT or have a train the trainer in-service.
ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE
NURS 8210 Week 6 Discussion: HIT Usability and Design Challenges
Reflect on your experiences with the integration of new technology. How have these implementations affected the procedures that you perform at work? As the end user, it can be easy to overlook all of the important decisions that went into the finished product that you see before you. In looking at the final data management screens, you may find yourself at the crossroads of two options. You may either 1) be ecstatic about the needed change that this system brought, or 2) frustrated because you feel the system brings new hurdles into your already busy day. If you have ever experienced the latter option, the comment “I could have implemented a better system than this” may resonate strongly with you. Though research agrees that user input assists HIT designers, the development and implementation of new systems is not as straightforward as it may appear. HIT development teams find themselves in constant phases of trial and error as they strive to meet the needs of all users within the proposed development timeline. Failure to achieve promised usability benefits can lead to increased costs and job complications. Applying effective strategies to overcome usability challenges is essential. NURS 8210 – Health Information Technology Systems Essay Discussion and Assignment – HIT Usability and Design Challenges Sample Paper.
In this week’s Discussion, you move from the standpoint of the “ outsider looking in” (end user) and place yourself into a real-world implementation example. To complete this Discussion, you evaluate a case study to determine where the implementation process took a wrong turn. Use this week’s Learning Resources to propose changes that could have put this operation on the road to success.
To prepare:
- Review the Learning Resources, focusing on the TIGER Usability and Clinical Application Design Collaborative.
- Consider the “Best Practice Exemplars” provided in the course text Nursing Informatics: Where Technology and Caring Meet.
- Review “Case Study 1: A Usability and Clinical Application Design Challenge” presented on page 238 of the course text Nursing Informatics: Where Technology and Caring Meet.
- Determine the causes of the noted usability challenges (i.e., human factors, ergonomics, human-computer interaction), as well as potential usability concerns experienced by staff during implementation. Consider the possible design failures that lead to the usability challenges. NURS 8210 – Health Information Technology Systems Essay Discussion and Assignment – HIT Usability and Design Challenges Sample Paper.
- What strategies might you employ to overcome these HIT usability challenges and concerns?
By Day 3 post a cohesive response to the following:
- Place yourself in the role of the clinical administrator tasked with implementing the case study’s new health information technology system.
-
- Evaluate the usability challenges that you faced during implementation as well as the factors that caused these challenges.
- Determine whether these challenges were a result of implementation or design.
- Formulate strategies for overcoming these usability challenges.
Read a selection of your colleagues’ postings.
By Day 6 respond to at least two of your colleagues in one or more of the following ways:
- Ask a probing question, substantiated with additional background information, evidence, or research.
- Share an insight from having read your colleagues’ postings, synthesizing the information to provide new perspectives.
- Offer and support an alternative perspective using readings from the classroom or from your own research in the Walden Library. NURS 8210 – Health Information Technology Systems Essay Discussion and Assignment – HIT Usability and Design Challenges Sample Paper.
- Validate an idea with your own experience and additional research.
- Make a suggestion based on additional evidence drawn from readings or after synthesizing multiple postings.
- Expand on your colleagues’ postings by providing additional insights or contrasting perspectives based on readings and evidence.
Return to this Discussion in a few days to read the responses to your initial posting. Note what you learned and/or any insights you gained as a result of the comments made by your colleagues.
Be sure to support your work with specific citations from this week’s Learning Resources and any additional sources.
Click on the Reply button below to post your response.
NURS 8210 Week 6: Health Information Technology Systems
When changes are implemented or new information technology systems are adopted, organizational leaders have a responsibility to make the transition as seamless as possible. When a system is easy to learn and utilize, this transition is more easily accomplished. When a system is less “user friendly,” this can become a barrier and impede acceptance. By focusing on user needs while developing system designs, those involved in HIT can promote efficacy and buy-in throughout the organization. NURS 8210 – Health Information Technology Systems Essay Discussion and Assignment – HIT Usability and Design Challenges Sample Paper.
This week, you examine how nurses identify and address usability and design challenges in information technology systems.
NURS 8210 – Health Information Technology Systems Essay Discussion and Assignment – HIT Usability and Design Challenges Sample PaperLearning Objectives
Students will:
- Formulate strategies for overcoming usability challenges of health information technology systems
- Analyze the overall usability and design of a health information technology system or application
Photo Credit: [teekid]/[E+]/Getty Images
Learning Resources
Note: To access this week’s required library resources, please click on the link to the Course Readings List, found in the Course Materials section of your Syllabus.
Required Readings
Course Text: Ball, M. J., Douglas, J. V., Hinton Walker, P., DuLong, D., Gugerty, B., Hannah, K. J., . . . Troseth, M. R. (Eds.) (2011). Nursing informatics: Where technology and caring meet (4th ed.). London, England: Springer-Verlag.
- Chapter 14, “Usability and Clinical Application Design”
This chapter begins by defining the terms usability and application design as they are used in the field of nursing informatics. The authors then describe the literature review and analytic process that the TIGER Collaborative group underwent to positively transform the development of HIT systems.
Gruber, D., Cummings, G. G., LeBlanc, L., & Smith, D. L. (2009). Factors influencing outcomes of clinical information systems implementation: A systematic review. CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing, 27(3), 151–163.
Retrieved from the Walden Library databases.
The authors analyze the outcomes of prior IT implementations to determine if certain strategies can guarantee success when launching new clinical information systems.
Kaufman, D., Roberts, W. D., Merrill, J., Lai, T., & Bakken, S. (2006). Applying an evaluation framework for health information system design, development, and implementation. Nursing Research, 55(2, Suppl. 1), S37–S42.
Retrieved from the Walden Library databases.
This article emphasizes the indispensable role of continuous evaluation throughout the development and real-time application of new information systems into the workplace.
Schlotzer, A., & Madsen, M. (2010). Health information systems: Requirements and characteristics. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 151, 156–166.
Retrieved from the Walden Library databases.
Use this article to examine the importance of focusing on sound design, interoperability of systems, and fulfillment of user needs when developing an effective database.
NURS 8210 Week 6 Discussion: Welcome to the Week 6 Discussion area!
Post your responses to the Discussion based on the course requirements.
Your Discussion postings should be written in standard edited English and follow APA guidelines as closely as possible given the constraints of the online platform. Be sure to support your work with specific citations from this week’s Learning Resources and additional scholarly sources as appropriate. Refer to the Essential Guide to APA Style for Walden Students to ensure your in-text citations and reference list are correct. Initial postings must be 250–350 words (not including references).
Submission and Grading Information
Grading Criteria
To access your rubric:
Week 6 Discussion Rubric
Post by Day 3 and Respond by Day 6
To participate in this Discussion:
Week 6 Discussion
Assignment 1: Application 2: Meaningful Use Paper
NURS 8210 – Health Information Technology Systems Essay Discussion and Assignment – HIT Usability and Design Challenges Sample Paper. Continue working on Assignment 2: Meaningful Use Paper, assigned in Week 5.
By Day 7
Submit your Assignment.
Submission and Grading Information
To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:
- Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK6Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.
- Click the Application 2 Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.
- Click the Week 6 Assignment link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area.
- Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as “WK6Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click Open.
- If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.
- Click on the Submit button to complete your submission.
Grading Criteria
Document: Week 6 Application 2 Rubric (Word document)
Check Your Assignment Draft for Authenticity
To check your Assignment draft for authenticity:
Submit your Week 6 Assignment draft and review the originality report.
Submit Your Assignment by Day 7
To submit your Assignment:
Week 6 Assignment
NURS 8210 Assignment 2: Application 3: Health Information Technology Project [Major Assessment 5]
Continue working on Application 3: Health Information Technology Project [Major Assessment 5], assigned in Week 4.
By Day 7 of Week 9
Submit your Assignment.
Grading Criteria
Document: Week 9 Major Assessment 5 Rubric (Word document)
Week in Review
This week you analyzed overall usability and design of a HIT system/application and formulated strategies for overcoming challenges. Next week you will explore the use of decision support systems along with cutting-edge technologies that seek to improve patient care and health outcomes. NURS 8210 – Health Information Technology Systems Essay Discussion and Assignment – HIT Usability and Design Challenges Sample Paper.
Rubric Detail- NURS 8210 Week 6
Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.
| Exemplary | Proficient | Sufficient | Developing | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Discussion Postings and Responses |
4 (100%) – 4 (100%)
• Discussion postings and responses are responsive to the requirements of the Discussion instructions and are posted by the due date. • Discussion postings and responses significantly contribute to the quality of interaction by providing rich and relevant examples, applicable research support, discerning ideas, and/or stimulating thoughts/probes and are respectful when offering suggestions, constructive feedback, or opposing viewpoints. • Discussion postings and responses demonstrate an in-depth understanding of concepts and issues presented in the course (e.g., insightful interpretations or analyses, accurate and perceptive parallels, and well-supported opinions) and are well supported, when appropriate, by pertinent research. • Discussion postings and responses provide evidence that the student has read and considered a sampling of colleagues’ postings and synthesized key comments and ideas, as applicable.
|
3 (75%) – 3 (75%)
• Discussion postings and responses are responsive to the requirements of the Discussion instructions and are posted by the due date. • Discussion postings and responses contribute to the quality of interaction by providing examples, research support when appropriate, ideas, and/or thoughts/probes, and are respectful when offering suggestions, constructive feedback, or opposing viewpoints. • Discussion postings and responses demonstrate some depth of understanding of the issues and show that the student has absorbed the general principles and ideas presented in the course, although viewpoints and interpretations are not always thoroughly supported. • Discussion postings and responses provide evidence that the student has considered at least some colleagues’ postings and synthesized some key comments and ideas, as applicable.
|
2 (50%) – 2 (50%)
• Discussion postings and responses are posted by the due date but are not always responsive to the requirements of the Discussion instructions. • Discussion postings and responses do little to contribute to the quality of interaction or to stimulate thinking and learning. • Discussion postings and responses demonstrate a minimal understanding of concepts presented, tend to address peripheral issues, and, although generally accurate, display some omissions and/or errors. • Discussion postings and responses do not provide evidence that the student has considered at least some colleagues’ postings or synthesized at least some key comments and ideas, as applicable. NURS 8210 – Health Information Technology Systems Essay Discussion and Assignment – HIT Usability and Design Challenges Sample Paper
|
0 (0%) – 1 (25%)
• Discussion postings and responses are posted past the late deadline, defined as 11:59 p.m. on the due date, and/or do not address the requirements of the Discussion instructions. • Discussion postings and responses do not contribute to the quality of interaction or stimulate thinking and learning. • Discussion postings and responses do not demonstrate an understanding of the concepts presented in the course, and/or do not address relevant issues, and/or are inaccurate and contain many omissions and/or errors. • Discussion postings and responses do not provide evidence that the student has read or considered colleagues’ postings, as applicable.
|
| Total Points: 4 |
|---|