NURS 6003 – Strategies for Addressing MSN program Questions – Academic and Professional Success Plan Template
Discussion – Week 2
Strategies for Addressing Questions
In Module 1, you began building a foundation for your success by considering a network-individuals and teams who can help you to clarify and execute on the vision. A network is most helpful when you are comfortable asking questions. Chances are other members of your network have experienced similar questions and may have helped guide others toward resolutions that can now be helpful. NURS 6003 – Strategies for Addressing MSN program Questions – Academic and Professional Success Plan Template.
In this Discussion, focus on the questions you are ready to ask as your journey begins. Keep in mind that sharing questions is often a great way to help others who have similar questions even if they do not realize it!
To prepare:
Reflect on questions or concerns you might have as you begin the MSN program.
Consider the individuals, teams, and departments you previously considered in Module 1 as well as how they may provide support with addressing these questions and concerns.
ORDER A CUSTOM-WRITTEN, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE
| Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor | |||
| Main Posting | 45 (45%) – 50 (50%)
Answers all parts of the discussion question(s) expectations with reflective critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.
Supported by at least three current, credible sources.
Written clearly and concisely with no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style. NURS 6003 – Strategies for Addressing MSN program Questions – Academic and Professional Success Plan Template |
40 (40%) – 44 (44%)
Responds to the discussion question(s) and is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
At least 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth.
Supported by at least three credible sources.
Written clearly and concisely with one or no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style. |
35 (35%) – 39 (39%)
Responds to some of the discussion question(s).
One or two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed.
Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.
Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
Post is cited with two credible sources.
Written somewhat concisely; may contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors.
Contains some APA formatting errors. |
0 (0%) – 34 (34%)
Does not respond to the discussion question(s) adequately.
Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria.
Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.
Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
Contains only one or no credible sources.
Not written clearly or concisely.
Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors.
Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style. |
||
| Main Post: Timeliness | 10 (10%) – 10 (10%)
Posts main post by day 3. |
0 (0%) – 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Does not post by day 3. |
||
| First Response | 17 (17%) – 18 (18%)
Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.
Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.
Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.
Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.
Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. |
15 (15%) – 16 (16%)
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.
Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.
Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. |
13 (13%) – 14 (14%)
Response is on topic and may have some depth.
Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.
Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.
Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited. |
0 (0%) – 12 (12%)
Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.
Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.
Responses to faculty questions are missing.
No credible sources are cited. |
||
| Second Response | 16 (16%) – 17 (17%)
Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.
Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.
Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.
Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.
Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. |
14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.
Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.
Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. |
12 (12%) – 13 (13%)
Response is on topic and may have some depth.
Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.
Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.
Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited. |
0 (0%) – 11 (11%)
Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.
Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.
Responses to faculty questions are missing.
No credible sources are cited. |
||
| Participation | 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Meets requirements for participation by posting on three different days. |
0 (0%) – 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Does not meet requirements for participation by posting on 3 different days. |
||
| Total Points: 100 NURS 6003 – Strategies for Addressing MSN program Questions – Academic and Professional Success Plan Template | ||||||
Name: NURS_6003_Module02_Week02_Discussion_Rubric
Academic and Professional Success Plan Template
Prepared by
x
.
NETWORK MEMBER 1
Name: x
Title: Psychiatric Mental Health Nurse Practitioner
Organization: x
Academic or Professional: Professional
I choose x because she is very passionate about mentoring and providing knowledgeable information to other. she has help me along my journey as a BSN student, and is willing to continue her support academically as my preceptor in time to come. NURS 6003 – Strategies for Addressing MSN program Questions – Academic and Professional Success Plan Template.
Notes: Reliable and efficient in her field.
NETWORK MEMBER 2
Name:xx
Title: Director of Nursing
Organization: x
Academic or Professional: Professional
I worked as a nursing supervisor with x as the DON for many years. she has encouraged me to further my education, providing instructive information resources, and networking strategies throughout our time working together.
Notes: She creates a positive work environment for professional growth
NETWORK MEMBER 3
Name: xxx
Title: Registered Nurses
Organization:
Academic or Professional: Professional
Over the years we have built a great a relationship, working together as a team, supporting each other dreams in the field of nursing. Enrolling in universities together, attending workshops and seminars. We also join professional organizations to keep up with new trans in nursing and remain up to date. NURS 6003 – Strategies for Addressing MSN program Questions – Academic and Professional Success Plan Template
Notes: Together we are a solid TEAM
NETWORK MEMBER 4
Name: Facebook groups, student success advisors, and Walden library
Title
Organization: Walden University
Academic or Professional: Academic
Walden university provides students with wealth of information for success. The student’s success advisors are also there to guild student into the right path. Facebook groups are another way to network with peers, sharing ideas and information. Students used the Facebook platform to also help each other navigate and understand course work. Walden library has all the resources to assist students with research, books, publications and articles. NURS 6003 – Strategies for Addressing MSN program Questions – Academic and Professional Success Plan Template