NRS 490 – Literature Evaluation Table
Literature Evaluation Table Rubric
Literature Evaluation Table Rubric
| 1 Unsatisfactory 0-71% 0.00% |
2 Less Than Satisfactory 72-75% 75.00% |
3 Satisfactory 76-79% 79.00% |
4 Good 80-89% 89.00% |
5 Excellent 90-100% 100.00% |
||
| 100.0 %Article Selection | ||||||
| 5.0 % Author, Journal (Peer-Reviewed), and Permalink or Working Link to Access Article | Author, journal (peer-reviewed), and permalink or working link to access article section is not included. | Author, journal (peer-reviewed), and permalink or working link to access article section is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. | Author, journal (peer-reviewed), and permalink or working link to access article section is present. | Author, journal (peer-reviewed), and permalink or working link to access article section is clearly provided and well developed. | Author, journal (peer-reviewed), and permalink or working link to access article section is comprehensive and thoroughly developed with supporting details. | |
| 5.0 % Article Title and Year Published | Article title and year published section is not included. | Article title and year published section is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. | Article title and year published section is present. | Article title and year published section is clearly provided and well developed. | Article title and year published section is comprehensive and thoroughly developed with supporting details. | |
| 10.0 % Research Questions (Qualitative) or Hypothesis (Quantitative), and Purposes or Aim of Study | Research questions (qualitative) or hypothesis (quantitative), and purposes or aim of study section is not included. | Research questions (qualitative) or hypothesis (quantitative), and purposes or aim of study section is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. | Research questions (qualitative) or hypothesis (quantitative), and purposes or aim of study section is present. | Research questions (qualitative) or hypothesis (quantitative), and purposes or aim of study section is clearly provided and well developed. | Research questions (qualitative) or hypothesis (quantitative), and purposes or aim of study section is comprehensive and thoroughly developed with supporting details. | |
| 5.0 % Design (Type of Quantitative, or Type of Qualitative) | Design (type of quantitative, or type of qualitative) section is not included. | Design (type of quantitative, or type of qualitative) section is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. | Design (type of quantitative, or type of qualitative) section is present. | Design (type of quantitative, or type of qualitative) section is clearly provided and well developed. | Design (type of quantitative, or type of qualitative) section is comprehensive and thoroughly developed with supporting details. | |
| 5.0 % Setting or Sample | Setting or sample section is not included. | Setting or sample section is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. | Setting or sample section is present. | Setting or sample section is clearly provided and well developed. | Setting or sample section is comprehensive and thoroughly developed with supporting details. | |
| 5.0 % Methods: Intervention or Instruments | Methods: Intervention or instruments section is not included. | Methods: Intervention or instruments section is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. | Methods: Intervention or instruments section is present. NRS 490 – Literature Evaluation Table | Methods: Intervention or instruments section is clearly provided and well developed. | Methods: Intervention or instruments section is comprehensive and thoroughly developed with supporting details. | |
| 10.0 % Analysis | Analysis section is not included. | Analysis section is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. | Analysis section is present. | Analysis section is clearly provided and well developed. | Analysis section is comprehensive and thoroughly developed with supporting details. | |
| 10.0 % Key Findings | Key findings section is not included. | Key findings section is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. | Key findings section is present. NRS 490 – Literature Evaluation Table | Key findings section is clearly provided and well developed. | Key findings section is comprehensive and thoroughly developed with supporting details. | |
| 10.0 % Recommendations | Recommendations section is not included. NRS 490 – Literature Evaluation Table | Recommendations section is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. | Recommendations section is present. | Recommendations section is clearly provided and well developed. | Recommendations section is comprehensive and thoroughly developed with supporting details. | |
| 10.0 % Explanation of How the Article Supports EBP or Capstone | Explanation of how the article supports EBP or capstone section is not included. | Explanation of how the article supports EBP or capstone section is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. | Explanation of how the article supports EBP or capstone section is present. | Explanation of how the article supports EBP or capstone section is clearly provided and well developed. | Explanation of how the article supports EBP or capstone section is comprehensive and thoroughly developed with supporting details. | |
| 10.0 % Presentation | The piece is not neat or organized, and it does not include all required elements. | The work is not neat and includes minor flaws or omissions of required elements. | The overall appearance is general, and major elements are missing. | The overall appearance is generally neat, with a few minor flaws or missing elements. | The work is well presented and includes all required elements. The overall appearance is neat and professional. | |
| 10.0 % Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use) | Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is employed. | Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. | Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. | Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. | The writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. NRS 490 – Literature Evaluation Table | |
| 5.0 % Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) | Sources are not documented. NRS 490 – Literature Evaluation Table | Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. | Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. | |
| 100 % Total Weightage | ||||||
NRS 490 – Literature Evaluation Table