| |
1
Unsatisfactory
59.00% |
2
Less Than Satisfactory
65.00% |
3
Satisfactory
75.00% |
4
Good
85.00% |
5
Excellent
100.00% |
| 70.0 %Content |
|
| 20.0 %Selection Of Health Care Delivery Systems To Examine (Two-Three). |
Not included. |
A selection of health care delivery systems to examine is present, but the information provided is incomplete, inaccurate, or otherwise deficient. |
A selection of health care delivery systems to examine is present, but minimal detail or support is provided for one or more components. |
A selection of health care delivery systems to examine is present and incorporated in full. The submission encompasses essential details and provides appropriate support. |
A selection of health care delivery systems to examine is present and comprehensive. The submission further incorporates analysis of supporting evidence insightfully and provides specific examples with relevance. Level of detail is appropriate. |
|
| 20.0 %Description With Relevant Details Of The Selected Delivery Systems. |
Not included. |
A description with relevant details of the selected delivery systems.is present, but the information provided is incomplete, inaccurate, or otherwise deficient. |
A description with relevant details of the selected delivery systems is present, but minimal detail or support is provided for one or more components. |
A description with relevant details of the selected delivery systems is present and incorporated in full. The submission encompasses essential details and provides appropriate support. |
A description with relevant details of the selected delivery systems is present and comprehensive. The submission further incorporates analysis of supporting evidence insightfully and provides specific examples with relevance. Level of detail is appropriate. |
|
| 15.0 %Summary Of The Mission Or Philosophy Statement For Each Of The Health Care Delivery Systems Selected |
Not included. |
A summary of the mission or philosophy statement for each of the health care delivery systems selected is present, but the information provided is incomplete, inaccurate, or otherwise deficient. |
A summary of the mission or philosophy statement for each of the health care delivery systems selected is present, but minimal detail or support is provided for one or more components. |
A summary of the mission or philosophy statement for each of the health care delivery systems selected is present and incorporated in full. The submission encompasses essential details and provides appropriate support. |
A summary of the mission or philosophy statement for each of the health care delivery systems selected is present and comprehensive. The submission further incorporates analysis of supporting evidence insightfully and provides specific examples with relevance. Level of detail is appropriate. |
|
| 15.0 %Mission Or Philosophy Statement, With Rationale As To Elements Included |
Not included. |
A mission or philosophy statement, with rationale as to elements included is present, but the information provided is incomplete, inaccurate, or otherwise deficient. |
A mission or philosophy statement, with rationale as to elements included is present, but minimal detail or support is provided for one or more components. |
A mission or philosophy statement, with rationale as to elements included is present and incorporated in full. The submission encompasses essential details and provides appropriate support. |
A mission or philosophy statement, with rationale as to elements included is present and comprehensive. The submission further incorporates analysis of supporting evidence insightfully and provides specific examples with relevance. Level of detail is appropriate. |
|
| 20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness |
|
| 7.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose |
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. |
Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear. |
Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose. |
Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. |
Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. |
|
| 20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness |
|
| 8.0 %Argument Logic and Construction |
Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. |
Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. |
Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. |
Argument shows logical progression. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. |
Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. |
|
| 20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness |
|
| 5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) |
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used. |
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. |
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. |
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. |
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. |
|
| 10.0 %Formats |
|
| 5.0 %Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) |
Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. |
Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent. |
Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. |
Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style. |
All format elements are correct. |
|
| 5.0 %Research Citations (in-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment) |
No reference page is included. No citations are used. |
Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used. |
Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present. |
Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and style is usually correct. |
In-text citations and a reference page are complete. The documentation of cited sources is free of error. |
|
| 100 %Total Weightage |
|
|