Assignment: Evidence-Based Project, Part 4: Critical Appraisal of Research
Critical Appraisal of Research
This paper systematically and carefully examines four studies to determine their relevance, value, and trustworthiness in addressing the issue of HAIs to influence good health outcomes in clinical settings. For nurses to safeguard public health and provide high-quality services, valid and reliable information is needed on what is likely or not likely to harm patients and the approaches to care that represent good value. Assignment: Evidence-Based Project, Part 4: Critical Appraisal of Research.
ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE
The study by Ford & Park (2018) was a clinical guideline based on the review of literature on hand hygiene and handwashing by NICE, WHO and other studies. It outlined the step-by-step guide on how to wash hands using liquid soap and water as the most effective decontamination method to prevent the spread of pathogens in the clinical setting. In the randomized controlled trial by Hovi, Ollgren & Savolainen-Kopra (2017), participants were randomized to two interventions (using alcohol hand-rubs or using water and soap) alongside a control group. All participants later provided weekly self-reported data on RTI and GTI symptoms. Assignment: Evidence-Based Project, Part 4: Critical Appraisal of Research. Handwashing with soap and water (intervention group) was considered the most effective approach that safeguarded the participants from GTI and RTI. However, the self-reported design of the study negatively impacts the reliability, validity and applicability of the findings.
In the observational cross-sectional study by Kingston & Dunne (2018), questionnaires were electronically administered to medical and nursing students whose responses revealed that gaps in knowledge on hand hygiene and handwashing are a potential barrier to deficits in hand hygiene practices and use of ABHRs which has a direct impact on the rates of HAIs. Halm & Sandau (2018) conducted a systematic review which revealed that the perceptions of health workers have an influence on hand hygiene practices. The study recommended that ABHRs reduce bacterial count and causes less irritation to the skin. Assignment: Evidence-Based Project, Part 4: Critical Appraisal of Research.
The above studies efficiently address the clinical practice issue of this EBP project and suggest that routine hand hygiene with soap and water is the most effective decontamination method to reduce the spread of pathogens and rates of HAIs in the clinical setting.
References
Ford, C., & Park, L. J. (2018). Hand hygiene and handwashing: key to preventing the transfer of pathogens. British Journal of Nursing, 27(20), 1164–1166.
Hovi, T., Ollgren, J., & Savolainen-Kopra, C. (2017). Intensified hand-hygiene campaign including soap-and-water wash may prevent acute infections in office workers, as shown by a recognized-exposure -adjusted analysis of a randomized trial. BMC Infectious Diseases, 17, 1–9. Assignment: Evidence-Based Project, Part 4: Critical Appraisal of Research
Kingston, L. M., O, C. N. H., & Dunne, C. P. (2018). A comparative study of hand hygiene and alcohol-based hand rub use among Irish nursing and medical students. Nurse Education Today, 63, 112–118.
Halm, M., & Sandau, K. (2018). Skin Impact of Alcohol-Based Hand Rubs Vs Handwashing. American Journal of Critical Care, 27(4), 334–337.
Assignment: Evidence-Based Project, Part 4: Critical Appraisal of Research
Realtors rely on detailed property appraisals—conducted using appraisal tools—to assign market values to houses and other properties. These values are then presented to buyers and sellers to set prices and initiate offers.
Research appraisal is not that different. The critical appraisal process utilizes formal appraisal tools to assess the results of research to determine value to the context at hand. Evidence-based practitioners often present these findings to make the case for specific courses of action. Assignment: Evidence-Based Project, Part 4: Critical Appraisal of Research
In this Assignment, you will use appraisal tools to conduct a critical appraisal of published research. You will then present the results of your efforts.
To Prepare:
• Review the Resources and consider the importance of critically appraising research evidence.
• Reflect on the four peer-reviewed articles you selected in Module 2 and analyzed in Module 3.
• Review and download the Critical Appraisal Tools document provided in the Resources.
The Assignment (Evidence-Based Project)
Part 4A: Critical Appraisal of Research
Conduct a critical appraisal of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected and analyzed by completing the Critical Appraisal Tools document. Be sure to include:
• An evaluation table
• A levels of evidence table
• An outcomes synthesis table
Part 4B: Critical Appraisal of Research
Based on your appraisal, in a 1-2-page critical appraisal, suggest a best practice that emerges from the research you reviewed. Briefly explain the best practice, justifying your proposal with APA citations of the research.
By Day 7 of Week 7 Assignment: Evidence-Based Project, Part 4: Critical Appraisal of Research
Submit Part 4A and 4B of your Evidence-Based Project.
Below are four peer reviewed journal to support for the critical appraisal research paper and the template
Article 1- Ford, C., & Park, L. J. (2018) –Level 7
Article 2- Hovi, T., Ollgren, J., & Savolainen-Kopra, C. (2017)-Level 2
Article 3 – Kingston, L. M., O, C. N. H., & Dunne, C. P. (2018)-Level 4
Article 4- Halm, M., & Sandau, K. (2018)-Level 1
Ford, C., & Park, L. J. (2018). Hand hygiene and handwashing: key to preventing the transfer of pathogens. British Journal of Nursing, 27(20), 1164–1166. https://doi-org.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/10.12968/bjon.2018.27.20.1164
Hovi, T., Ollgren, J., & Savolainen-Kopra, C. (2017). Intensified hand-hygiene campaign including soap-and-water wash may prevent acute infections in office workers, as shown by a recognized-exposure -adjusted analysis of a randomized trial. BMC Infectious Diseases, 17, 1–9. https://doi-org.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/10.1186/s12879-016-2157-z
Kingston, L. M., O, C. N. H., & Dunne, C. P. (2018). A comparative study of hand hygiene and alcohol-based hand rub use among Irish nursing and medical students. Nurse Education Today, 63, 112–118. https://doi-org.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2018.01.022
https://www-sciencedirect-com.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/science/article/pii/S0260691718300492?via%3Dihub
Halm, M., & Sandau, K. (2018). Skin Impact of Alcohol-Based Hand Rubs Vs Handwashing. American Journal of Critical Care, 27(4), 334–337. https://doi-org.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/10.4037/ajcc2018727
Below are the research databases I used to conduct my research
Walden University Library. (n.d.-b). Evidence -based practice research: CINAHL Search help.
Retrieved September 6, 2019, from
https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/library/healthevidence/medlinesearchhelp Assignment: Evidence-Based Project, Part 4: Critical Appraisal of Research
Library of Congress. (n.d.). Search /browse help-Boolean Operators and nesting
Retrieved September 19, 2018, from,
https://catalog.loc.gov/vwebv/ui/en_US/htdocs/help/searchKeyword.html
Walden Library. (n.d.) PubMed: Getting Started. Retrieved September 19, 2019 from,https://www-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/pubmed/?otool=mnwullib
Note
Please don’t change the template the professor wants the original template. Also, the paper should include an introduction the critical appraisal as the body and a conclusion Assignment: Evidence-Based Project, Part 4: Critical Appraisal of Research