Clinical Supervision – Kaltura, Certification Plan, Safe Prescribing and Decision Tree

Clinical Supervision – Kaltura, Certification Plan, Safe Prescribing and Decision Tree

Week 4: Substance-Related and Addictive Disorders

I can’t believe that stupid horse lost! My inside man told me it was a sure bet at 20:1 odds. I thought for sure that I would be able to make back the money I lost yesterday. What am I going to tell my wife? That was the money for the mortgage payment…well, the last three mortgage payments. She does not know I have been spending my days at the track. I lost my job at the company because a few hundred dollars went missing. I just need a break. I know this next horse will be my winner!

Michael, age 37

Substance abuse and addiction affects persons in all walks of life; every ethnic and economic group is affected in some way by addiction or substance abuse. In your practice as a PMHNP, you will encounter patients with substance abuse and dependence. Some of the people who present for treatment are at a low point in their lives and want to turn things around. They may present for other conditions such as depression or bipolar disorder, anxiety, PTSD, or personality disorders. One of the most common ways of self-medicating a mental illness is with alcohol and illicit drugs. Marijuana is a common substance used by clients to treat various symptoms. To effectively treat clients with addictive disorders and substance use disorders, the provider needs to examine their own values and thoughts about the use of substances. Clinical Supervision – Kaltura, Certification Plan, Safe Prescribing and Decision Tree

This week, you will analyze clients presenting for treatment of substance-related and addictive disorders and evaluate effectiveness of therapeutic approaches for clients diagnosed with substance-related and addictive disorders.

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE


Learning Resources

Note: To access this week’s required library resources, please click on the link to the Course Readings List, found in the Course Materials section of your Syllabus. Clinical Supervision – Kaltura, Certification Plan, Safe Prescribing and Decision Tree

Required Readings

Sadock, B. J., Sadock, V. A., & Ruiz, P. (2014). Kaplan & Sadock’s synopsis of psychiatry: Behavioral sciences/clinical psychiatry (11th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer.

  • Chapter 20, “Substance Use and Addictive Disorders” (pp. 616–693)

American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.

Note: You will access this book from the Walden Library databases.

Stahl, S. M. (2014). Prescriber’s Guide: Stahl’s Essential Psychopharmacology (5th ed.). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

 

Note: All Stahl resources can be accessed through the Walden Library using the link below. This link will take you to a login page for the Walden Library. Once you log in to the library, the Stahl website will appear. http://ezp.waldenulibrary.org/login?url=http://stahlonline.cambridge.org/. Clinical Supervision – Kaltura, Certification Plan, Safe Prescribing and Decision Tree

 

To access information on specific medications, click on The Prescriber’s Guide, 5th Ed. tab on the Stahl Online website and select the appropriate medication.

Alcohol abstinence Alcohol dependence Alcohol withdrawal Nicotine addiction Opioid dependence Reversal of benzodiazepine effects
acamprosate
disulfiram
nalmefene
naltrexone
chlordiazepoxide
clonidine
clorazepate
diazepam
lorazepam
oxazepam
bupropin
varenicline
buprenorphine
naltrexone
flumazenil

Note: For more information about buprenorphine, see https: //www.samhsa.gov/medication-assisted-treatment/qualify-nps-pas-waivers. Clinical Supervision – Kaltura, Certification Plan, Safe Prescribing and Decision Tree

Required Media

Ashwood, D. (Producer). (n.d.-a). Mindfulness-based relapse prevention for addictions: Volume I [Video file]. Mill Valley, CA: Psychotherapy.net.

 

Note: The approximate length of this media piece is 69 minutes. You will access this video through the Walden Library databases.

Ashwood, D. (Producer). (n.d.-b). Mindfulness-based relapse prevention for addictions: Volume II [Video file]. Mill Valley, CA: Psycotherapy.net.

 

Note: The approximate length of this media piece is 126 minutes. You will access this video through the Walden Library databases. Clinical Supervision – Kaltura, Certification Plan, Safe Prescribing and Decision Tree

Optional Resources

Gabbard, G. O. (2014). Gabbard’s treatment of psychiatric disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publications.

  • Chapter 46, “Alcohol-Related Disorders”
  • Chapter 47, “Sedative-, Hypnotic-, or Anxiolytic-Related Disorders”
  • Chapter 48, “Opioid-Related Disorders: Opioid Detoxification”
  • Chapter 49, “Opioid-Related Disorders: Antagonist Treatment”
  • Chapter 50, “Opioid-Related Disorders: Agonist Maintenance Treatment”
  • Chapter 51, “Hallucinogen-Related Disorders
  • Chapter 52, “Cannabis-Related Disorders”
  • Chapter 53, “Club Drug Addiction”
  • Chapter 54, “Stimulant-Related Disorders”
  • Chapter 55, “Nicotine-Related Disorders”
  • Chapter 56, “Individual Therapy for Substance Use Disorders”
  • Chapter 57, “Cognitive, Behavioral, and Motivational Therapies for Substance Use Disorders”
  • Chapter 58, “Group Therapy for Substance Use Disorders”
  • Chapter 59, “Family Therapy in Substance Abuse Treatment”
  • Chapter 60, “Network Therapy for Substance Use Disorders”
  • Chapter 61, “Pain and Addiction”
  • Chapter 62, “Gambling Disorder”

Note: You will access this textbook from the Walden Library databases.

Bechtold, J., Simpson, T., White, H. R., & Pardini, D. (2015). Chronic adolescent marijuana use as a risk factor for physical and mental health problems in young adult men. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 29(3), 552–563. doi:10.1037/adb0000103. Clinical Supervision – Kaltura, Certification Plan, Safe Prescribing and Decision Tree

Note: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases.

Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). (2013b). TIP 48: Managing depressive symptoms in substance abuse clients during early recovery. Retrieved from http://store.samhsa.gov/product/TIP-48-Managing-Depressive-Symptoms-in-Substance-Abuse-Clients-During-Early-Recovery/SMA13-4353

Note: This document is available as free download.

Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). (2013b). TIP 42: Substance abuse treatment for persons with co-occurring disorders. Retrieved from http://store.samhsa.gov/product/TIP-42-Substance-Abuse-Treatment-for-Persons-With-Co-Occurring-Disorders/SMA13-3992

Note: This document is available as free download.

Borchardt, D. (2017). National Academy of Sciences pushes for rescheduling of marijuana. Forbes. Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com/sites/debraborchardt/2017/01/18/national-academy-of-sciences-suggests-removing-barriers-to-cannabis-research-basically-deschedule/#22269c753f76. Clinical Supervision – Kaltura, Certification Plan, Safe Prescribing and Decision Tree

Discussion: Clinical Supervision – Kaltura

Substance use disorders are complicated psychiatric and medical conditions that involve physical addiction as well as psychological or emotional dependence. Substance use disorders are some of the most difficult to treat. It takes a great deal of patience on the part of the provider and the client. It may take several attempts before a client is successfully able to “kick the habit.” Your guidance and patience can help the client to persevere through difficult times during the journey to recovery.

Clinical Supervision is an essential component of your development as a psychiatric mental health nurse practitioner. It provides an opportunity for professional collaboration as you share experiences with and gain insights from colleagues. For this Clinical Supervision, consider a client with a substance abuse disorder whom you do not think is adequately progressing according to expected clinical outcomes. Clinical Supervision – Kaltura, Certification Plan, Safe Prescribing and Decision Tree

Learning Objectives

Students will:
  • Analyze clients presenting for treatment of substance-related and addictive disorders
  • Evaluate effectiveness of therapeutic approaches for clients diagnosed with substance-related and addictive disorders
  • Recommend treatment plans

Note: For this Discussion, you are required to complete your initial post before you will be able to view and respond to your colleagues’ postings. Begin by clicking on the “Post to Discussion Question” link and then select “Create Thread” to complete your initial post. Remember, once you click submit, you cannot delete or edit your own posts, and cannot post anonymously. Please check your post carefully before clicking Submit!

To prepare for this Discussion:

  • Review this week’s Learning Resources concerning treating patients with substance-related and addictive disorders.
  • Reflect on a client you are currently counseling or have previously counseled at your practicum site who has been diagnosed with substance-related and addictive disorders. Clinical Supervision – Kaltura, Certification Plan, Safe Prescribing and Decision Tree

By Day 3

Post a 3- to 5-minute Kaltura video in which you do the following:

  • Describe the client. Note: Do not use the client’s actual name.
  • Explain your therapeutic approach with the client, including the perceived effectiveness of your approach.
  • Identify any additional information about this client that may potentially impact expected outcomes.
  • Provide specific recommendations for the client to help them in determining why they are not progressing and what your suggested treatment plan consists of. It is useful to consult the Prochaska and DiClement model.

Note: Nurse practitioners must have strong oral communication skills. This Discussion is designed to help you hone these skills. When filming your Kaltura video, be sure to dress and speak in a professional manner.

View a selection of your colleagues’ responses.

By Day 6

Respond to at least two of your colleagues by suggesting an alternate therapeutic approach. Support your feedback with evidence-based literature and/or your own experiences with clients. Clinical Supervision – Kaltura, Certification Plan, Safe Prescribing and Decision Tree

Submission and Grading Information

Grading Criteria

To access your rubric:

Week 4 Discussion Rubric

Post by Day 3 and Respond by Day 6

To participate in this Discussion:

Week 4 Discussion


Assignment 1: Week 1 Practicum Journal Entry: Certification Plan

By Day 7

Submit your Assignment. Refer to Week 1 for additional guidance.

Submission and Grading Information

To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:

  • Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK4Assgn1+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.
  • Click the Week 4 Assignment 1 Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.
  • Click the Week 4 Assignment 1 link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area.
  • Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as “WK4Assgn1+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click Open.
  • If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.
  • Click on the Submit button to complete your submission. Clinical Supervision – Kaltura, Certification Plan, Safe Prescribing and Decision Tree
Grading Criteria

To access your rubric:

Week 4 Assignment 1 Rubric

Check Your Assignment Draft for Authenticity

To check your Assignment draft for authenticity:

Submit your Week 4 Assignment 1 draft and review the originality report.

Submit Your Assignment by Day 7

To submit your Assignment:

Week 4 Assignment 1


Assignment 2: Week 2 Practicum Journal: Safe Prescribing

By Day 7

Submit your Assignment. Refer to Week 2 for additional guidance. Clinical Supervision – Kaltura, Certification Plan, Safe Prescribing and Decision Tree

Submission and Grading Information

To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:

  • Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK4Assgn2+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.
  • Click the Week 4 Assignment 2 Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.
  • Click the Week 4 Assignment 2 link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area.
  • Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as “WK4Assgn2+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click Open.
  • If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.
  • Click on the Submit button to complete your submission.
Grading Criteria

To access your rubric:

Week 4 Assignment 2 Rubric

Check Your Assignment Draft for Authenticity

To check your Assignment draft for authenticity:

Submit your Week 4 Assignment 2 draft and review the originality report.

Submit Your Assignment by Day 7

To submit your Assignment:

Week 4 Assignment 2


Assignment 3: Week 3 Practicum Journal: Decision Tree

By Day 7

Submit your Assignment. Refer to Week 3 for additional guidance.

Submission and Grading Information

To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:

  • Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK4Assgn3+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.
  • Click the Week 4 Assignment 3 Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.
  • Click the Week 4 Assignment 3 link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area.
  • Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as “WK4Assgn3+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click Open. Clinical Supervision – Kaltura, Certification Plan, Safe Prescribing and Decision Tree
  • If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.
  • Click on the Submit button to complete your submission.
Grading Criteria

To access your rubric:

Week 4 Assignment 3 Rubric

Check Your Assignment Draft for Authenticity

To check your Assignment draft for authenticity:

Submit your Week 4 Assignment 3 draft and review the originality report.

Submit Your Assignment by Day 7

To submit your Assignment:

Week 4 Assignment 3


Assignment 4: Board Vitals

This week you will be responding to twenty Board Vitals questions that cover a broad review of your Nurse Practitioner program courses up to this point.

These review questions will provide practice that is critical in your preparation for the national certification exam that’s required to certify you to practice as a nurse practitioner. These customized test questions are designed to help you prepare for your Nurse Practitioner certification exam. It is in your best interest to take your time, do your best, and answer each question to the best of your ability. Clinical Supervision – Kaltura, Certification Plan, Safe Prescribing and Decision Tree

You can access Board Vitals through the link sent to you in email or by following the link below:

https://www.boardvitals.com/

By Day 7

Complete the Board Vitals questions.

Practicum Reminder

Time Logs: You are required to keep a log of the time you spend related to your practicum experience and enter every patient you see each day. You can access your time log from the Welcome Page in your Meditrek account. You will track time individually for each patient you work with. Please make sure to continuously input your hours throughout the term. Clinical Supervision – Kaltura, Certification Plan, Safe Prescribing and Decision Tree


Making Connections

This week, you analyzed clients presenting for treatment of substance-related and addictive disorders and evaluated effectiveness of therapeutic approaches for clients diagnosed with substance-related and addictive disorders.

Next week, you will, once again, become “captain of the ship” as you take full responsibility for a client with a bipolar disorder by recommending psychopharmacologic treatment and psychotherapy, identifying medical management needs and community support, and recommending follow-up plans. You will use the decision tree format to justify your rationale for diagnosis, pharmacological treatment, and psychotherapy of a patient with a mental illness. You also will evaluate the results of your Fitzgerald University Exit Comprehensive Exam and, based on those results, develop a plan of action to prepare for the certification exam. Clinical Supervision – Kaltura, Certification Plan, Safe Prescribing and Decision Tree

NURS_6670_Week4_Discussion_Rubric

Outstanding Performance Excellent Performance Competent Performance Proficient Performance Room for Improvement
Main Posting: Response to the discusion question is reflecive with critical analysis and synthesis representive of knowledg gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.
Points Range: 44 (44%) – 44 (44%)
* Thoroughly responds to the discussion question(s) *is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources. * supported by at least 3 current, credible sources
Points Range: 40 (40%) – 43 (43%)
* Responds to the discussion question(s) *is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. * 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth * supported by at least 3 credible references
Points Range: 35 (35%) – 39 (39%)
* Responds to most of the discussion question(s) *is somewhat reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. * 50% of post has exceptional depth and breadth * supported by at least 3 credible references
Points Range: 31 (31%) – 34 (34%)
* Responds to some of the discussion question(s) * one to two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed *is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis *somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. * post is cited with fewer than 2 credible references
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 30 (30%)
* Does not respond to the discussion question(s) * lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria *lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis *does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. * contains only 1 or no credible references
Main Posting: Writing
Points Range: 6 (6%) – 6 (6%)
* Written clearly and concisely * Contains no grammatical or spelling errors * Fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style
Points Range: 5.5 (5.5%) – 5.5 (5.5%)
* Written clearly and concisely * May contain one or no grammatical or spelling error * Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style
Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
* Written concisely * May contain one to two grammatical or spelling error * Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style
Points Range: 4.5 (4.5%) – 4.5 (4.5%)
*Written somewhat concisely * May contain more than two2 spelling or grammatical errors * Contains some APA formatting errors
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 4 (4%)
* Not written clearly or concisely * Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors * Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style
Main Posting: Timely and full participation
Points Range: 10 (10%) – 10 (10%)
* meets requirements for timely and full participation * posts main discussion by due date
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
NA
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
NA
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
NA
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
* does not meet requirement for full participation
First Reponse
Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources.
Points Range: 9 (9%) – 9 (9%)
* response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings * responds to questions posed by faculty * the use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives
Points Range: 8.5 (8.5%) – 8.5 (8.5%)
* response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings
Points Range: 7.5 (7.5%) – 8 (8%)
* response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting
Points Range: 6.5 (6.5%) – 7 (7%)
* response is on topic, may have some depth. Clinical Supervision – Kaltura, Certification Plan, Safe Prescribing and Decision Tree
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 6 (6%)
* response may not be on topic, lacks depth
First Reponse: Writing
Points Range: 6 (6%) – 6 (6%)
* Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues * Response to faculty questions are fully answered if posed * Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources * Response is effectively written in Standard Edited English
Points Range: 5.5 (5.5%) – 5.5 (5.5%)
* Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues * Response to faculty questions are answered if posed * Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources * Response is effectively written in Standard Edited English
Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
* Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues * Response to faculty questions are mostly answered if posed * Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources * Response is written in Standard Edited English
Points Range: 4.5 (4.5%) – 4.5 (4.5%)
* Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication * Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered if posed * Few or no credible sources are cited
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 4 (4%)
* Responses posted in the discussion lack effective * Response to faculty questions are missing * No credible sources are cited
First Reponse: Timely and full participation
Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
* meets requirements for timely and full participation * posts by due date
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
NA
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
NA
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
NA
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
* does not meet requirement for full participation
Second Reponse: Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources.
Points Range: 9 (9%) – 9 (9%)
* response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings * responds to questions posed by faculty * the use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives
Points Range: 8.5 (8.5%) – 8.5 (8.5%)
* response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings
Points Range: 7.5 (7.5%) – 8 (8%)
* response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting
Points Range: 6.5 (6.5%) – 7 (7%)
* response is on topic, may have some depth
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 6 (6%)
* response may not be on topic, lacks depth
Second Reponse: Writing
Points Range: 6 (6%) – 6 (6%)
* Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues * Response to faculty questions are fully answered if posed * Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources * Response is effectively written in Standard Edited English
Points Range: 5.5 (5.5%) – 5.5 (5.5%)
* Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues * Response to faculty questions are answered if posed * Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources * Response is effectively written in Standard Edited English
Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
* Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues * Response to faculty questions are mostly answered if posed * Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources * Response is written in Standard Edited English
Points Range: 4.5 (4.5%) – 4.5 (4.5%)
* Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication * Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered if posed * Few or no credible sources are cited
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 4 (4%)
* Responses posted in the discussion lack effective * Response to faculty questions are missing * No credible sources are cited. Clinical Supervision – Kaltura, Certification Plan, Safe Prescribing and Decision Tree
Second Reponse: Timely and full participation
Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
* meets requirements for timely and full participation * posts by due date
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
NA
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
NA
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
NA
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
* does not meet requirement for full participation

NURS_6670_Week4_S/U_Assignment1_Rubric

Satisfactory Unsatisfactory
Quality of Work Submitted: The extent of which work meets the assignned criteria and work reflects graduate level critical and analytic thinking.
Points Range: 26 (26%) – 30 (30%)
Assignment meets expectations. All topics are addressed with a minimum of 50% containing good breadth and depth about each of the assignment topics.
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 25 (25%)
Assignment superficially meets some of the expectations. Two or more required topics are either not addressed or inadequately addressed.
Quality of Work Submitted: The purpose of the paper is clear.
Points Range: 4 (4%) – 5 (5%)
Purpose of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
No purpose statement was provided.
Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas: The extent to which the work reflects the student’s ability to:
Understand and interpret the assignment’s key concepts.
Points Range: 8 (8%) – 10 (10%)
Demonstrates a clear understanding of key concepts.
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 7 (7%)
Shows a lack of understanding of key concepts, deviates from topics.
Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas: The extent to which the work reflects the student’s ability to:

Apply and integrate material in course rsources (i.e. video, required readings, and textook) and credible outside resources.

Points Range: 16 (16%) – 20 (20%)
Integrates specific information from 1 credible outside resource and 2-3 course resources to support major points and point of view. Clinical Supervision – Kaltura, Certification Plan, Safe Prescribing and Decision Tree
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 15 (15%)
Includes and integrates specific information from 0 to 1 resoruce to support major points and point of view.
Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas: The extent to which the work reflects the student’s ability to:
Synthesize (combines various components or different ideas into a new whole) material in course resources (i.e. video, required readings, textbook) and outside, credible resources by comparing different points of view and highlighting similarities, differences, and connections.
Points Range: 16 (16%) – 20 (20%)
Summarizes information gleaned from sources to support major points, but does not synthesize.
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 15 (15%)
Rarely or does not interpret, apply, and synthesize concepts, and/or strategies.
Written Expression and Formatting
Paragraph and Sentence Structure: Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are clearly structured and carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance.
Points Range: 4 (4%) – 5 (5%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity 80% of the time.
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity < 60% of the time. Clinical Supervision – Kaltura, Certification Plan, Safe Prescribing and Decision Tree
Written Expression and Formatting
English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation
Points Range: 3 (3%) – 5 (5%)
Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 2 (2%)
Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.
Written Expression and Formatting
The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running head, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.
Points Range: 3 (3%) – 5 (5%)
Contains a few (1-2) APA format errors.
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 2 (2%)
Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.

NURS_6670_Week4_S/U_Assignment2_Rubric

Satisfactory Unsatisfactory
Quality of Work Submitted: The extent of which work meets the assignned criteria and work reflects graduate level critical and analytic thinking.
Points Range: 26 (26%) – 30 (30%)
Assignment meets expectations. All topics are addressed with a minimum of 50% containing good breadth and depth about each of the assignment topics.
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 25 (25%)
Assignment superficially meets some of the expectations. Two or more required topics are either not addressed or inadequately addressed.
Quality of Work Submitted: The purpose of the paper is clear.
Points Range: 4 (4%) – 5 (5%)
Purpose of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
No purpose statement was provided.
Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas: The extent to which the work reflects the student’s ability to:
Understand and interpret the assignment’s key concepts.
Points Range: 8 (8%) – 10 (10%)
Demonstrates a clear understanding of key concepts. Clinical Supervision – Kaltura, Certification Plan, Safe Prescribing and Decision Tree
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 7 (7%)
Shows a lack of understanding of key concepts, deviates from topics.
Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas: The extent to which the work reflects the student’s ability to:

Apply and integrate material in course rsources (i.e. video, required readings, and textook) and credible outside resources.

Points Range: 16 (16%) – 20 (20%)
Integrates specific information from 1 credible outside resource and 2-3 course resources to support major points and point of view.
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 15 (15%)
Includes and integrates specific information from 0 to 1 resoruce to support major points and point of view.
Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas: The extent to which the work reflects the student’s ability to:
Synthesize (combines various components or different ideas into a new whole) material in course resources (i.e. video, required readings, textbook) and outside, credible resources by comparing different points of view and highlighting similarities, differences, and connections.
Points Range: 16 (16%) – 20 (20%)
Summarizes information gleaned from sources to support major points, but does not synthesize.
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 15 (15%)
Rarely or does not interpret, apply, and synthesize concepts, and/or strategies. Clinical Supervision – Kaltura, Certification Plan, Safe Prescribing and Decision Tree
Written Expression and Formatting
Paragraph and Sentence Structure: Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are clearly structured and carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance.
Points Range: 4 (4%) – 5 (5%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity 80% of the time.
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity < 60% of the time.
Written Expression and Formatting
English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation
Points Range: 3 (3%) – 5 (5%)
Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 2 (2%)
Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.
Written Expression and Formatting
The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running head, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.
Points Range: 3 (3%) – 5 (5%)
Contains a few (1-2) APA format errors.
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 2 (2%)
Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.

NURS_6670_Week4_S/U_Assignment3_Rubric

Satisfactory Unsatisfactory
Quality of Work Submitted: The extent of which work meets the assignned criteria and work reflects graduate level critical and analytic thinking.
Points Range: 26 (26%) – 30 (30%)
Assignment meets expectations. All topics are addressed with a minimum of 50% containing good breadth and depth about each of the assignment topics.
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 25 (25%)
Assignment superficially meets some of the expectations. Two or more required topics are either not addressed or inadequately addressed.
Quality of Work Submitted: The purpose of the paper is clear.
Points Range: 4 (4%) – 5 (5%)
Purpose of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
No purpose statement was provided.
Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas: The extent to which the work reflects the student’s ability to:
Understand and interpret the assignment’s key concepts.
Points Range: 8 (8%) – 10 (10%)
Demonstrates a clear understanding of key concepts. Clinical Supervision – Kaltura, Certification Plan, Safe Prescribing and Decision Tree
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 7 (7%)
Shows a lack of understanding of key concepts, deviates from topics.
Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas: The extent to which the work reflects the student’s ability to:

Apply and integrate material in course rsources (i.e. video, required readings, and textook) and credible outside resources.

Points Range: 16 (16%) – 20 (20%)
Integrates specific information from 1 credible outside resource and 2-3 course resources to support major points and point of view.
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 15 (15%)
Includes and integrates specific information from 0 to 1 resoruce to support major points and point of view.
Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas: The extent to which the work reflects the student’s ability to:
Synthesize (combines various components or different ideas into a new whole) material in course resources (i.e. video, required readings, textbook) and outside, credible resources by comparing different points of view and highlighting similarities, differences, and connections.
Points Range: 16 (16%) – 20 (20%)
Summarizes information gleaned from sources to support major points, but does not synthesize.
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 15 (15%)
Rarely or does not interpret, apply, and synthesize concepts, and/or strategies. Clinical Supervision – Kaltura, Certification Plan, Safe Prescribing and Decision Tree
Written Expression and Formatting
Paragraph and Sentence Structure: Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are clearly structured and carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance.
Points Range: 4 (4%) – 5 (5%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity 80% of the time.
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity < 60% of the time.
Written Expression and Formatting
English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation
Points Range: 3 (3%) – 5 (5%)
Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 2 (2%)
Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.
Written Expression and Formatting
The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running head, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.
Points Range: 3 (3%) – 5 (5%)
Contains a few (1-2) APA format errors.
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 2 (2%)
Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. Clinical Supervision – Kaltura, Certification Plan, Safe Prescribing and Decision Tree
Open chat
WhatsApp chat +1 908-954-5454
We are online
Our papers are plagiarism-free, and our service is private and confidential. Do you need any writing help?